November 2005
Economic Outlook 2006
Economic Outlook 2006:
Slowing, But Still Growing

Experts assembled at MSCI’s Forecast 2006 Economic Summit last month shared a general optimism about continued metals demand, though the growth rate may have peaked in 2005.

By Tim Triplett,
Editor-in-Chief

Sidebars and Tables:

Despite the expected boost from hurricane reconstruction, demand for industrial metals could experience some turbulence in the next few years. “In general, the [global] economic environment is in the process of slowing,” said Paul Kasriel, senior vice president and director of economic research with the Northern Trust Co., addressing members of the Metals Service Center Institute last month in Chicago.

The U.S. economy, which grew at a 4.6 percent pace in the first half of 2004, slowed to around 3.6 percent in the first half of 2005, and may well slow further due to the effects of the hurricane disasters in the Gulf Coast area.

“For some time—we don’t know how long—the American economy will not be able to grow as rapidly. Katrina took out a lot of our energy production and distribution abilities, as well as transportation capacity, which will restrict the economy’s ability to grow,” said Kasriel. He added that about 25 percent of U.S. crude oil and natural gas production comes from the Gulf of Mexico. About 10 percent of U.S. petroleum-refining capacity is in the New Orleans area.

Kasriel noted that the index of leading economic indicators is up only 1.9 percent this year vs. 10 percent last year, indicating that the pace of economic growth is moderating. “The LEI is moving down, flashing some warning signals,” he said. “If the Fed continues to raise rates, I think the LEI will flash those signals even more.”

Housing and consumer discretionary spending will bear the brunt of the economy’s slowdown, Kasriel said. Housing is very expensive today, relative to household income. In fact, housing affordability is at its lowest level since 1991, which suggests that housing prices could start declining.

Rising mortgage rates, and a slowdown in housing construction and sales, could dampen consumer discretionary spending, the main driver of the economy. “In recent years, a lot of people have been treating their houses as though they were their own personal ATM machines,” Kasriel said. “As quickly as the value of the house goes up, people refinance, take out a bigger mortgage, and use the equity they extracted to buy a big screen TV or some other toy. Last year people took over $300 billion out of their houses.” If real estate values begin to level off, homeowners will be less inclined to borrow their equity. “So households will have to increase their net worth in a different way—by spending less than they earn,” he added.

When past generations retired, they tended to own their homes free and clear. Today’s “McMansion” owner may still have a big debt when retirement rolls around. “How are we going to retire and pay the mortgage? My theory is we will become a nation of bed and breakfast proprietors, renting out our spare rooms to Chinese and Indian tourists, and driving them around in our SUVs showing them this great country of ours,” he said, drawing laughs from the crowd. “So I think we will see a slowdown in consumer discretionary spending and a return to old-fashioned thrift going forward.”

One big plus for economic growth in 2006 will be federal spending on infrastructure repairs in the South. “President Bush has essentially written a blank check for the rebuilding of the Gulf Coast,” he said.

Optimistically, he estimated, the U.S. economy will grow about 3 percent next year, below the trend rate of 3.5 percent.

Meanwhile, the Fed remains concerned about inflation and is likely to continue its campaign of regular increases in the short-term rate, now at 3.75 percent. “The Fed is going to raise rates to at least 4 percent and perhaps beyond,” Kasriel predicted.

He ended his remarks with a note of caution, warning that if the Fed pushes rates too far too fast, it could send the economy into recession because of the excesses in the housing market and high debt levels in the consumer sector.

Over 60 percent of bank loans are housing related, he noted. “If something goes wrong with the housing sector, something will go wrong with the banking sector.”

Offering an international perspective, Joshua Mendelsohn, chief economist with Mendelsohn Global Economics, predicts global GDP growth should average from 3.0 to 3.5 percent in 2005 and 2006—down a bit from 2004’s 4.0 percent, but still reasonably healthy.

Growth around the globe is far from uniform, however. “The pattern of growth remains unbalanced, with the U.S. and Asia, especially China, continuing to drive the world economy,” he said.

The effects of the Gulf Coast hurricanes will cause some weakness in the U.S. economy for the balance of the year, but reconstruction should give it an offsetting boost in 2006. China’s growth rate is expected to decelerate next year, but only modestly, to around 8.5 percent, which means the United States and China will continue to lead the world market.

Reflecting weakness in Germany, Italy and France, the Eurozone continues to under perform, with growth this year and next forecast at less than 2 percent. Japan’s economy has shown signs of recovery, “but in both Japan and the Eurozone, slow and insufficient structural reforms are contributing to weak growth,” Mendelsohn said.

Oil prices remain the key risk to the world economy, though prices should recede in the coming months as gulf oil facilities come back on line. Prices most likely will remain above earlier projections, however, due to such factors as speculation, concerns over developments in the Middle East, constrained production capacity and rising exploration costs.

So far oil prices have had limited effect on global growth, he added. In real terms, oil prices have not yet reached the peaks of 1980-81, while the world is much more energy efficient today.

Other unpredictable risks to global economic health include government protectionism, the potential housing market collapse in the United States and the ever-growing U.S. current account deficit.

CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
Mid-Decade Boom Continues
“Not only do I believe we are in the midst of a three-year up cycle through 2006, but I think most of the economists you heard today are much too pessimistic about industrial America. We are going to see the best decade this industry has seen for a long time,” asserted Eli Lustgarten, president of ESL

Consultants and senior vice president of Longbow Research, in his presentation on the capital, agricultural and industrial equipment markets.

The stage is set for a strong industrial market through the end of the decade, Lustgarten said. While the consumer sector is fading a bit, heavy industry is on the comeback. “If the steel industry doesn’t make money in this environment, you should all be ashamed of yourselves,” he told his audience of mill and service center executives.

The first half of 2005 was “a fooler,” he said, as high steel and oil prices helped set off a mini inventory correction, prompting companies to liquidate their stocks rather than purchase high-priced goods.

Oil prices ought to return to pre-hurricane levels in the next few weeks, he predicted, though the price of gasoline will remain volatile. Natural gas promises to be a more prolonged problem. “Higher oil and gas prices will be a fact of life, though not the end of the world.”

The lack of capital investment over the past five years, coupled with positive cash flow from strong sales in 2004, will lead to continued recovery of capital spending next year, he said. “Capital spending should continue to strengthen in 2006, with capacity utilization rates nearing 80 percent. Global markets and U.S. competitiveness overseas should improve, helped by the weakening dollar. Postponed purchases and technological enhancements should help spur new investment in capital goods.”

With 3.8 percent growth in the first quarter and 3.3 percent in the second quarter, “the underlying economy is clearly very healthy,” he said. Nonfarm payrolls rose by more than a half million jobs in the summer months, and consumer spending was up 3 percent in the second quarter, down only a half percent from the first quarter. “The job numbers aren’t bad, and consumer spending looks OK.”

Polls show that consumer attitudes have taken a hit due to runaway hurricanes and gas prices, but consumer spending has not. “Spending patterns are more resilient than some expect them to be,” Lustgarten said. “As long as money [lending rates] stays relatively easy, the economy will keep perking along.”

Pointing to steady job growth, higher average wages and manufacturing productivity that continues to climb, he emphasized that “ the industrial sector will participate strongly, if not lead, in economic recovery.”

China is not a threat to this country’s industrial manufacturing base today, as it consumes most of the capital goods it produces. “But in five years, it may be a monster. You can see that coming,” he said.

With U.S. GDP growth in the 3.0 to 3.5 percent range this year and next—below earlier forecasts due to the hurricane effects—the industrial sector will slow from double to single digit growth in 2006 as it approaches the midpoint of the cycle, Lustgarten said. “In 2004, the rising tide lifted all boats. In 2005-2006, that model will change. The rising tide will leave behind a few losers.”

Farm equipment will be one of them. Reacting to uncertainty on several levels, farm equipment makers cut production in 2005. Despite drought conditions in some areas, grain supplies are above normal, putting pressure on prices. With lower commodity prices, higher fuel costs, and the possibility funds may be shifted from the 2007 federal farm bill to help pay for hurricane recovery and the war in Iraq, the outlook for agriculture spending is guarded, Lustgarten said.

On the other hand, sales of construction equipment are poised to take off, for a number of reasons, including a robust housing market, hurricane rebuilding and new federal highway funding.

“It may have seen its best days, but no matter how you slice it, the housing market is still healthy,” Lustgarten said. In 2004, nonresidential construction spending finally turned up 3 to 4 percent, while residential construction remained surprisingly strong at 1.95 million housing starts. The residential sector may decline a bit in 2005, as interest rates rise, to about 1.85 million starts. Preliminary 2006 residential forecasts of 1.8 million starts still put the market well above historical averages. Meanwhile, office and commercial construction could recover another 6 to 8 percent next year.

Much of the spending on new construction equipment, spurred by the $285 billion federal highway bill, has already taken place, Lustgarten said. Contractors bought a lot of equipment in the last year to take advantage of tax incentives. “While building of highways will be stronger, construction equipment won’t increase at the same rate, since much has already been spent.” He expects 5 to 10 percent growth in 2006, weighted toward medium and heavy equipment.

Pointing to the “Katrina Effect,” he added that it is unclear how the rebuilding of the Gulf Coast will proceed. “We shouldn’t assume that all of New Orleans gets rebuilt in New Orleans. A lot could take place [on higher ground] from Houston to Galveston.” Funded by federal dollars, the massive reconstruction effort could provide a multi-year stimulus to the region.

High fuel costs continue to weigh down the profitability of the airlines, but passenger miles have recovered from the effects of the 9/11 terrorist attack.

Orders for new aircraft fell in 2004, but turned around in 2005 and will recover further in 2006, driven by overseas deliveries. Lustgarten estimates 5 to 7 percent growth for aviation-related sales in 2005. “The airlines are all in bankruptcy, but that doesn’t seem to stop anyone from lending them money.”

He sees continued volatility, but also opportunity, in the petrochemical industry. “Active petrochemical projects worldwide are well below where they should be, given the price of energy, due to the uncertainty and turmoil in the Middle East. We are just not spending the money on oil and gas that we should. But that should be a good market for the next four or five years.”

The machine tool industry should see spending increase by 15 to 20 percent per year for the next few years to compensate for under investment in that sector, as well.

Much power generation capacity was built in the 1960s through the 1980s. The issue today is not increasing base load capacities, but getting the power to the place it’s needed. The latest federal energy bill addresses this issue, he said. “Transmission expenditures are going up and ought to look good for the next couple of years.” Portable generators also will be in high demand for some time.

An “emissions boom” is under way in the truck market. Lustgarten expects truck sales to jump in 2006 as owners try to reduce the age of their fleets ahead of stricter federal air quality regulations. The new 2007 engine emission standards call for added filtration of exhaust gases. Standards that are even more restrictive are due in 2010, which will require extensive redesigns of engines and trucks. Most fleet owners will be looking to upgrade their vehicles before the end of the decade, when they will have to buy the cleaner, but considerably more expensive, new technology.

The capital equipment market is at the mid-point of a decade-long boom, Lustgarten emphasized. “It will not be linear, though. There will be many inventory corrections along the way.”

AUTOMOTIVE
Mixed Picture for Carmakers
As automakers struggle through a period of “profitless prosperity,” suppliers to the industry must come to terms with contradictory data that suggests nearly 18 million new vehicles will be produced next year in North America, and yet the market will be disappointingly “soft.”

Dennis DesRosiers of DesRosiers Automotive Consultants Inc. explained that the pricing environment remains very lean for carmakers in North America. At the root of this pricing deflation is a consumer who has come to expect employee-type discounts, and excess auto production capacity that is getting worse rather than better. “It is very difficult to close plants in politically sensitive industries like automotive,” DesRosiers noted.

At the same time, Japanese, German and Korean companies have continued to bring production capacity to North America, forcing the Big Three to reposition their capacity for added output. Demand has failed to increase at the same pace, though ownership of vehicles continues to grow, and usage is stable despite high gas prices.

“Sure we have a great market, but an awful lot of product is coming in from offshore,” DesRosiers said. “It will continue like that for the rest of the decade. China will creep in at some point, but it won’t be a major influence for this decade.”

All the increase in vehicle production has been on the “New Domestic” side of the equation, as Toyota, Honda and Nissan continue to steal market share from Ford, GM and Chrysler.

The Big Three are expected to produce 11,222,738 vehicles in 2005 or 68.1 percent of the market vs. New Domestics at 4,927,457 or a 29.9 percent share. By 2010, the Big Three’s output is projected to decline to 9,969,548 or 58.8 percent, while the New Domestics’ production will grow to 6,646,365 units or a 39.2 percent share.

The message for suppliers, such as metals producers and distributors: “Focus on the New Domestics. Any entity over-reliant on GM, Ford and DaimlerChrylser has a negative adjustment to make,” DesRosiers said.

Although long-term demand for auto consumption is positive, the market did not experience a “real” cyclical downturn as expected at the end of the decade, DesRosiers said, so there is not much upside potential in the near term. Indeed, there appears to be more downside threat.

He described two opposing views of the North American auto market’s near-term future: one gives heavy weight to economic fundamentals and projects 1 to 3 percent growth over the next few years, to annual production of over 19 million vehicles. The other gives more weight to such industry variables as low growth of vehicle ownership, falling used vehicle prices, escalating operating costs and fewer consumer incentives. They predict the market will decline by 2 to 3 percent per year to under 18 million vehicles.

“Nobody is predicting a free fall, most are soft up or down,” DesRosiers said.

Long-term, vehicle ownership trends are positive. The United States has more vehicles on the road than people of driving age; Canada has about 70 percent ownership, while Mexico lags at a disappointing 14 percent. “Mexico doesn’t seem to be developing as we had hoped,” DesRosiers said.

Vehicles don’t just fill the transportation needs of a healthy U.S. economy; they fill the psychological desires of an affluent society. “You could probably meet the fundamental needs for transportation with 70 to 75 percent ownership,” he added.

Product development is moving into a new era, he continued, with automakers dramatically cutting the time it takes to get enticing new designs from the drawing board into production. Historically, automakers have introduced 30-some new models per year. That pace is increasing to 40-some, and is projected to top 60 for the 2007 model year. “This is all very positive for the market and suppliers. When they introduce a new model, the supply contracts are normally opened.” About 1,000 overseas suppliers have relocated to North America, however, restricting the ability of existing players to supply the New Domestics.

CONSTRUCTION
Building Outlook “Guardedly Positive”
Analysts at UBS Research expect real GDP in the United States to gradually decelerate from a projected 3.2 percent in fourth-quarter 2005 to 2.8 percent in fourth-quarter 2006. Along with it will come a decline in industrial production, which will affect steel consumption, said Timna Tanners, North American Steel research analyst with UBS.

The question is whether the construction sector can outperform the economy as a whole. “What I’ve been hearing over and over is that a nonresidential recovery is around the corner. But I’ve been hearing that for the last three years,” Tanners said.

Keys to watch include how much higher oil prices affect consumer sentiment, she said, as well as corporate spending. Hurricane damage will slow economic growth in the South, but that slowdown will be offset to some degree by better demand for steel during the rebuilding process.

Last year, automotive production was spurred on by consumer incentives, while construction lagged. Next year, in a reversal of fortunes, UBS forecasts zero to 2 percent growth for automotive, while construction picks up steam.

Census Bureau figures show that nonresidential construction is no longer deteriorating, though it has leveled out well below year 2000’s peak. Today the greatest potential for growth is in government spending. “We’re hoping that private spending can kick in and contribute more than it has recently,” Tanners said.

Two important indicators for a potential construction recovery are commercial vacancy rates and capacity utilization. Data show vacancy rates starting to improve, though it remains to be seen if space availability is tight enough yet to trigger new construction. Capacity utilization, which is nearing 80 percent, is an even stronger signal that more factories may need to be built, she added.

Usage of construction machinery has been on the upswing since 2002, and really accelerated beginning in 2004, to about 185,000 units in 2005. “The nice thing for the construction machinery industry is that they are passing on higher prices without much resistance,” she said.

Passage of the highway bill, which earmarks at least $287 billion in federal spending, promises to boost construction work even further through 2009. But how much steel will be used is a function of steel pricing, Tanners said. “If prices remain stable, you can see the consumption of steel rising. If prices go up, it could stay stable or decline. But it is bullish for the consumption of rebar, and beams to the extent they are consumed in highway development.”

Tanners characterized her analysis as “guardedly positive” for nonresidential construction, though a slowdown of world growth could cancel out some of the positives for construction spending. While leading indicators suggest GDP is slowing in the face of high fuel costs and interest-rate worries, the hurricane rebuild promises to boost steel demand for at least the next three years, she said.

APPLIANCE
Housing to Sustain Growth
Most trends in the appliance industry are pointed upward, though the rate of growth is slowing, said Evan Barrington, vice president of the Stevenson Co.

Taking a long-term view of the core appliance sector—refrigerators, ranges, dishwashers and laundry washers and driers—he noted that appliance shipments have grown at an annual rate of 5.7 percent since 1997, far outpacing the average for the prior 20 years of 1.7 percent. “When you think of appliances, you think of one of those old-line manufacturing industries that is relatively mature with not much happening. But in fact, there has been a fair amount happening,” Barrington said.

He estimated that 46 million appliances will be shipped this year—nearly 70 million if non-core appliances such as microwaves and air conditioners are included.

Taking a short-term view, Barrington’s data showed a slowdown in early 2005. “What happened was the first price increase in about 15 years—a price increase (about 3 percent) that actually took,” he said. Activity has since picked up, with strong shipments in August. It’s too early to gauge the impact of hurricane recovery, he added.

He described the four key drivers of appliance demand: new housing construction, existing home sales, remodeling and appliance replacement. “If you want to know what’s going on in the appliance industry, watch what’s happening in the housing industry.”

Barrington is more optimistic about the continuation of the housing boom than many other economists. “However, there clearly are some reasons for concern and some things to watch,” he said.

Looking at housing completions—as opposed to housing starts, because they correlate better with appliance demand—Barrington projects a 5 percent increase for 2005, nearing 2 million new housing units. “Those completions are going to happen because, in most cases, the starts are already in the ground, moving along quite well.”

Before the hurricanes, Barrington was projecting a slight decline in new housing, due mostly to the expectation that long-term mortgage rates would eventually rise as the Fed continues to raise short-term rates. “Short-term rates have gone up 11 straight times, so I think we’re going to see long-term rates come up. But if I’m wrong, and long-term rates stay flat, housing will stay strong that much longer.”

The effects of the hurricanes on appliance demand will depend on the response in terms of housing. “Clearly there’s going to be a lot of building going on in the gulf area. An unbelievably large number of homes were destroyed. The question is, what’s the timing on that? If we look at past hurricanes, new construction really doesn’t kick in until the next year. But the federal government is more involved today than it has been in prior hurricanes, so we’re going to have to watch that.”

Reconstruction efforts may be hampered by a lack of materials, Barrington added. “There are only so many resources out there to build houses,” including manpower and building materials. “If a lot of construction starts very quickly on the Gulf Coast, that might just mean less activity elsewhere, as we’re using a constrained set of resources.”

Though the manufactured housing sector may get a kick-start from hurricane relief, it has fallen on hard times recently. In the late 1990s, manufactured housing (mobile homes) accounted for almost 400,000 units a year with well over a million appliances. Today, they provide half that demand.

For every existing home that changes hands, an average of 1.2 appliances are replaced. So 7 million home sales per year generate about 8.4 million new appliance sales. Similarly, the increase in remodeling activity is another growing source of demand for appliances, he said.

Product designs today make heavy use of stainless steel, though Barrington said it’s impossible to predict how much longer its popularity will grow. “Other colors are coming out that may grab some of the momentum from stainless. I suspect we might be getting close to the peak on stainless steel.”

Front-loading clothes washers, popularized by Maytag’s Neptune, are selling for twice the average washing machine price. They appeal to consumers’ environmental sensibilities by using less energy, soap and water. “I’ve noticed that people want to tell their neighbors they have one of these Neptune washers. It’s almost like talking about the new car in your driveway. This is a big change in our industry. We have more and more features out there that consumers are buying because they want to be able to tell their friends they have them.”

The appliance industry is still under tremendous pressure to keep manufacturing and materials costs down, to meet consumer expectations for low prices. The market is polarizing, with an increase in shoppers buying full-featured high-end units, and an increase in those buying economical low-end units. “Everybody is trying to focus on the high-end, because that’s where the margin is. But they have to keep the low-end in mind also, because that’s where the volume is. The middle is getting squeezed.”

Appliance imports are gaining market share, mostly from Mexico, where domestic manufacturers have moved production facilities. Asian companies have been looking to gain a foothold in the North American market, though with limited success so far.

All total, Barrington forecasts 1 percent growth for appliance shipments in 2005, on top of 8.3 percent last year. 2006 will see another modest 1 to 2 percent gain, perhaps more depending on the hurricane recovery.

“In nine of the last 10 years, we’ve set an all-time record in terms of appliance shipments. We should set another record this year. This is still a very strong industry, but with growth not as strong as we’ve seen in previous years.”

CARBON PLATE
Forecast for 5 Percent Growth
Though ownership of the plate market has consolidated through a flurry of mergers, acquisitions and closures over the past eight years, U.S. plate capacity has grown from 6.2 million tons in 1997 to 7.45 million tons in 2005.

Panelists, including executives from Mittal Steel, Oregon Steel, Jindahl United Steel, Ipsco Steel and Primary Steel, contributed the following data on the carbon plate sector.

The top three producers in 1998 had 3.05 million tons of plate capacity for a 51 percent share of the market. Today, the top three—Mittal, Nucor and Ipsco—command about 6.0 million tons or more than 80 percent of the market.

Industry data shows that North American plate mill capacity for both cut plate and plate in coil is 12.45 million tons. Estimated 2005 production will hit 8.295 million tons, which means the industry is operating at nearly 67 percent capacity. Among the Big Three, Mittal is operating at 51 percent capacity, Ipsco at 70 percent and Nucor at 91 percent.

U.S. plate imports in 1998 totaled 2 million tons, but have declined to around 1 million tons today, a function of a more stable, consolidated domestic industry, trade cases and the value of the dollar against foreign currencies, panelists explained.

In the heat-treat segment of the plate market, demand has averaged about 875,000 tons. The total supply of 1 million tons includes 250,000 tons of imports. Thus, domestic mills are expected to increase their output of heat-treated product to take advantage of the domestic shortfall.

Overall, the forecast for apparent plate consumption in 2006 is 6.3 million tons of domestic shipments, a 5 percent increase over 2005. About 1 million tons of imports will offset 1 million tons of exports for an apparent supply of 6.3 million tons. The outcome of sunset reviews on plate-related trade cases could affect future import levels.

The demand outlook is strong for plate in machinery and construction equipment, railcars, wind towers, barges and ships, truck/trailer, OCTG and line pipe, bridge construction, and service centers, the panelists reported.

Worldwide plate output will increase, with China bringing on 11 million tons of additional capacity in 2006 and 2007. The question is whether China will consume all it produces, or become a net exporter of plate.

Editor’s note: For insights about the carbon flat-roll market, see MSCI panelists’ comments in MCN’s October issue, in the feature headlined: “Steel Outlook: Carbon Flat-Roll—Buyer Beware.”

BAR PRODUCTS
Demand, Volatility Remain High
Economic indicators look promising for continued demand of steel bar products in 2006, even at higher prices, as much inventory has been worked out of the system, said Linn Osterman, vice president of steel sales and marketing at The Timken Co.

Bar represented 16 percent, and wire rod another 3 percent, of the 112 million tons of steel produced in the United States in 2004. Bar shipments totaled 18.5 million tons last year, of which 45 percent was rebar, 39 percent was hot-rolled, 8 percent was cold-finished and 8 percent light shapes, according to figures from the American Iron and Steel Institute.

Industry shipments of all types of steel, including bar, declined by 9.6 percent in the first eight months of 2005, however, while mill capacity utilization was at 84 percent, down from 93 percent a year ago,

Imports have become a bigger factor in the bar market this year. The first half of 2005 saw a 6.4 percent increase in imports of hot-rolled bar vs. the first half of 2004. Cold-finished bar imports jumped 56 percent in the same period. “There was a tremendous change in the dynamic of the cold-finished market,” Osterman reported.

Acknowledging how difficult steel’s volatility has been for service centers and other customers, Osterman said he expects alloy prices to continue rising, along with energy costs and scrap. “We believe [the price of] scrap will end up somewhere above where it is right now. There is a lot of uncertainty in scrap, such as how the supply will be influenced by the hurricanes.”

Though prices appear on the upswing, Timken remains bullish on demand for bar in the coming year, Osterman said.

Meanwhile, the steel industry is striving to grow the bar market by working with mills, customers and universities to develop new steel grades and processing efficiencies. For example, he said, design engineers are working to produce bars that are stronger yet lighter and more machineable for applications such as vehicle crankshafts

Michael Parrish, executive vice president at Nucor Corp., said the trend in cold-finished bar demand has been relatively flat since 1985. Nucor places total apparent domestic consumption of cold-finished bar this year at around 2.0 to 2.2 million tons. The industry’s capacity to produce cold-finished bar exceeds demand by around 400,000 tons.

Despite the overcapacity situation, the market had high expectations in early 2005, based on carryover from the strong 2004 and falling scrap prices. But the market was still working off excess inventory throughout the supply chain in the first and second quarters, which moderated consumption. “Inventory is probably in good shape now,” Parrish noted, adding that demand in most end-use markets remains generally strong. “Overall, we expect a pretty good finish to 2005 in the cold-finished business.”

Bill Jones, president and CEO of O’Neal Steel, said both suppliers and customers unanimously expect positive demand for bar products in 2006 in most markets. “Capital goods manufacturing, which is key to bar products, is extremely strong. We don’t see anything short of a catastrophic event that could change that,” Jones said.

He ticked off the list of high-demand markets for 2006: railcar, truck and trailer, barge, shipbuilding, construction and mining equipment, material handling, energy and military. Growth in automotive and agricultural machinery will be flat, though at a fairly high level.

He noted the positive effects of federal transportation and energy bills, as well as federal hurricane relief headed to the South. “Katrina and Rita will [cause a surge of] federal dollars into the gulf region at least into the second quarter of next year,” Jones said. “If past hurricanes are an example, this is to be followed by a two- to five-year rebuilding program that is positive for our industry and many others.”

Overall, O’Neal is forecasting slight growth in consumption of bar products, with adequate availability except for possible shortages of certain heat-treated alloys. Imports should be available to fill in any gaps or disruptions in the market, he said. “We are an event-driven industry, and it’s such events that tend to cause movements in pricing and availability. Imports of bar products will be there to address any such events.”

STAINLESS
Market Works Down Excess Supply
The stainless sheet and strip market, which topped 2 million tons of consumption last year, will finish 2005 down slightly to around 1.9 million tons, recovering to over the 2 million mark again in 2006, forecast stainless market analyst Ed Blot, president of Ed Blot and Associates Inc.

Stainless imports accounted for over 20 percent of the U.S. sheet and strip market in 2004, but import penetration should dip to around 17 percent for 2005 and 2006.

“China, back in 2002, was almost nonexistent. In 2003, they had only about 2 percent of the imports. In 2004, their share was up to 13 percent. In flat-roll they have become a major importer into the U.S.,” Blot said.

In the stainless plate market, consumption has declined a bit this year from 2004’s 300,000 tons. Blot expects some recovery in 2006, though not quite to 2004 levels. Most of the increase will come from imports. Last year, import penetration in stainless plate was around 20 percent. This year and next he expects it to range from 27 to 28 percent.

In the stainless bar and shapes category, consumption peaked in 2000 at over 310,000 tons, declining over the following three years to around 230,000 tons. Since then, the market has grown steadily and should approach 300,000 tons again next year, Blot said.

The bar segment has seen big swings in imports, primarily from Italy, India, Taiwan, France and Germany. Import penetration of bar climbed from around 35 percent in 2004 to 40 percent this year, and should decline again to around 30 percent in 2006, he added.

“Sheet and plate are forecast to be down this year, but bar will be up,” Blot said. “While consumption is down this year, it is not down as much as mill orders. Right now flat-roll mills are hungry for orders.”

Stainless supply has been interrupted by changes at the mill level, notably last year’s closure of Slater Steel’s Atlas holdings in Canada, Slater’s sale of its Fort Wayne facility to Valbruna, and the acquisition of J&L Specialty Steel by Allegheny Technologies.

“It was a four month gap before Allegheny purchased J&L’s operation and got it running again. Meanwhile, a lot of orders were placed offshore—not so much because of price but due to concerns over availability. That added to the increase in inventory, which led to the current destocking of flat products,” Blot explained.

In addition, North American Stainless has been aggressive about adding capacity, entering the long products market last year. NAS has been constrained by the amount of billet it can get from parent company Acerinox, however, Blot said.

“Imports ordered in fourth quarter last year are still coming in; that’s why the import penetration numbers in the first half are still very high. But that will level off as we get to the fourth quarter,” he added.

Pointing to major end-use markets for stainless, Blot expects double-digit gains in aerospace this year and next, as well as in power generation. Growing at more modest rates in 2006 will be petrochemical, construction, oil and gas, and household goods. Automotive is expected to decline a bit.

Base pricing of stainless will likely decline in 2006, as the cost of raw materials moderates, Blot said. “Since nickel is such a primary element, people often say that as nickel prices go, so do stainless prices.” Blot forecasts the cost of nickel will decline from $6.80 a pound this year to an average around $5.00 a pound next year, due to an increase in global nickel capacity.

“North American Stainless continues to add more capacity in both flat and long products. They are here to stay and compete in the market worldwide. That’s going to keep prices down,” he added.

 

 

 

Questions or comments about Metal Center News. E-mail feedback@metalcenternews.com