October 2005
STEEL OUTLOOK: Carbon Flat-Roll
Buyer Beware

Steel demand remains healthy across most end-use markets despite rising prices and surcharges. Yet each prediction for the next 90-180 days contains a caveat on the ripple effects of the horrific hurricane season.

By Corinna Petry,
Managing Editor

Sidebars and Tables:

Steel producers, distributors and industry analysts are forecasting continued economic strength over the next three to six months, driving consumption of carbon steel flat-roll products up 2 to 3 percent. But a host of risks could make their forecasts obsolete.

In automotive, a critical market for the North American flat-roll industry, production is forecast to hit 16.9 million units this year, rising to 17.1 million vehicles in 2006. Though the Big Three continue to lose market share to the New Domestics (such as Honda, Nissan and Toyota), “automotive is certainly not in a slump,” commented Roy Platz, director of marketing for Mittal Steel USA, during the Metals Service Center Institute’s economic summit last month in Chicago.

June and July experienced a “very early cleanout of inventory of 2005 models. That usually happens in October and November,” he added.

John Anton, director-steel service for Global Insight Inc., Washington, D.C., expects auto sales to slow next year. “The carmakers sold forward with their employee discounts, robbing Peter to pay Paul, and it’s not necessarily profitable. Auto production during the fourth quarter is replenishing inventory, but it means a weaker 2006.”

Brian Aranha, vice president-commercial for Dofasco Inc., Hamilton, Ontario, forecasts that auto industry steel consumption will be flat going into next year. “The effect of high gasoline prices on vehicle sales has yet to be seen.”

Joe Harden, president of Worthington Steel, Columbus, Ohio, is also uncertain about the rate of automotive sales next year, “especially whether $3 a gallon will have any impact, and how quickly it will change buying patterns of vehicles.”

Steel suppliers worry about escalating prices for energy, not just from their own cost point of view, but also with regard to what higher prices will do to consumer spending.

Up to now, Platz says, U.S. consumers experienced job growth and rising wages, which have offset higher energy prices. “The danger going forward is that as unemployment rates rise, consumer spending will decline.”

He predicts steel consumption will shift a bit from consumer durables to construction. “As people have less money to spend, consumer durables will wane, but nonresidential construction should be very strong next year.”

Anton also expects consumer spending to retreat slightly. “We won’t see a consumer meltdown. It won’t be like the 1981 recession. But we might see a noticeable backup in consumer demand.”

Nevertheless, steel demand should remain healthy as various industries replenish inventories that declined sharply this year, Platz says. “That flows very quickly into the need for raw materials.”

Steel demand will increase in 2006, he notes, “but apparent consumption will increase even more. That’s because a good chunk of consumption this year was fed out of inventory.” He estimates 4 million tons of inventory was consumed. Dofasco’s Aranha puts the figure at 3 million tons.

“At least half the growth next year, we think, will be due to the fact that consumption will not be fed out of inventory,” Platz says, forecasting that real consumption for flat-roll products will grow 2 to 3 percent in 2006, barring unexpected effects of high natural gas and crude oil prices.

The upside of energy prices, of course, is increased oil and gas drilling activity, which should drive up sales of steel products headed for oilfields for years to come, Aranha says. “In North America this year, we expect apparent consumption to be down 6 percent. In 2006, we are expecting growth of about 3.5 percent in steel consumption overall.”

Hurricane nervousness
The lingering effect of Gulf Coast hurricanes on the rest of the U.S. economy brings some nervousness to the steel industry.

“We believe Hurricane Katrina had a pretty big impact, but the economy could deal with it. But our latest thinking is that Rita may be a one-two punch that may deal some real damage, particularly on the energy side of things,” warns Global Insight’s Anton. “Rita may not take as much rebuilding [as Katrina], but shutting down the energy [sources] could make this a pretty bad winter.”

Based on Katrina alone, Anton’s forecast calls for weaker consumption of sheet and stronger consumption of rebar, structural and plate products, because the latter will be needed for reconstruction. “Once they rebuild all the houses, they will need new appliances. So in late 2006 or early 2007, you will see appliance [and sheet demand] uptick.”

In the shorter term, he says, the storms “take consumer wealth away. Sheet is going to be weaker for the fourth quarter, mostly because of hurricane effects.” Demand for flat-roll will tail down about 3 percent, he estimates.

Platz notes that the Federal Reserve revised its GDP growth estimate downward by 0.5 percent due to the effects of Hurricane Katrina, but he’s confident that’s only a short-term setback. “We see some growth being taken out of the second half, but most of that gets put back in next year. 2006 will see growth due to all of the reconstruction efforts.”

Chuck Bradford, president of Bradford Research, New York, points to the silver lining: “The hurricane damage does represent a great opportunity for mills and service centers to convince people to rebuild with steel—to avoid mold problems, insects, as well as building to withstand storms.”

Inventories in line,
but buyers cautious

Mike Siegal, chairman of Olympic Steel Corp., Cleveland, sees mill deliveries moving out and spot prices moving up. “The market on a consumption basis remains very strong to the end of year and maybe beyond,” he says, while expressing concern about unpredictable byproducts of the hurricanes and the outlook for automotive. “Everybody is concerned with what’s going on in Detroit, in terms of [automotive supplier] companies’ ability to pay their bills,” he adds.

O’Neal Steel, Birmingham, and its Metalwest division in Denver each reduced inventories during the first half, President Bill Jones says. “Our flat-roll inventory is in good shape. We have seen the market strengthen somewhat. Our own order rate has increased a good bit. So not only is our inventory in line, but our shipments are also picking up.”

Customers are telling O’Neal their business is solid. “For capital goods and just about all major manufacturing groups, the outlook is fairly strong. Metal buildings began to pick up this year. For the first time in four or five years, we are beginning to see an increase in fabrication/construction markets. We are hearing from most of our customers that they are busy now, could get even busier and should be busy for the foreseeable future.”

That activity level, and higher input costs, is translating into higher prices from mills, many of which are being noncommittal about availability.

“Mill lead times are strange. They are acting as though there is a huge shortage,” commented a commercial executive at one Texas flat-roll distributor.

William Vitucci, vice president and chief financial officer of Vitco Steel Supply Corp., Posen, Ill., calls the mill supply situation “mysterious.” Producer order books are being shuffled around in terms of when they open and close, he says, adding, “The mills are not forecasting product availability.”

Producers’ published prices for hot-roll increased $40 to $60 a ton for October. “They’re definitely going up. It’s no longer just based on scrap and raw materials. Energy and hydrogen gas are playing a bigger role in base prices or in surcharges.”

Vitucci suggests some of the mills’ pricing moves may not stick. “No one knows how long to hold off [making purchases] in this volatile market—whether you hold for prices to go up, or just buy and play the market as it is.”

Feralloy Corp., Chicago, is adhering to its traditional buying pattern in spite of rising prices. Hot-roll prices moved from $480 to $500 a ton in September and to $560 a ton in October, says President and CEO Frank Walker. All flat-roll products are readily available, he notes, but “lead times did jump over the last couple weeks. October is closed and our mill suppliers are booking November.”

The sell side has Walker pleased. “Since July, our volume has improved substantially. The consuming industries have improved their inventory positions so they are more in a buy mode now. Manufacturing has not improved dramatically, but the inventory correction has taken place.

“Most capital goods markets are pretty good,” he continues, especially agriculture, construction equipment and railcars, “which are major markets for us. We see nonresidential construction on the verge of picking up.”
Vitucci also reports a pick-up in activity, even among OEMs that are ordering strictly for what they need today.

One flat-roll distributor/processor in Illinois has seen customer orders move up sharply in the past month, and the company’s sales manager predicts “a pretty good market for at least the next 60 days.”

Although he has seen producer pricing rise as much as $110 per ton over the last few months, “our customers have been accepting the price increases as we put them out, almost weekly for the last month.”

Orders are strong from customers that produce railcars, tanks, utility poles and wind towers. The company also has seen its processing business jump. “Our production in August increased 30 percent above the average over the previous six months,” the sales manager says. “September is on track to do the same, and October looks just as good for us.”

The leader of Worthington Steel, based in Columbus, Ohio, says there has been a disconnect between actual consumption, which is steady, and apparent demand, which has been “anything but stable.”

President Joe Harden says steel demand has not necessarily been driven “by any rationality, but by distribution channels and others acting emotionally. As prices are perceived to be going up, people buy steel in excess of their requirements. Then as inventories are deemed too high, people slow their buying to a level below their typical consumption.”

Domestic vs. foreign prices
As domestic steel prices move higher in the second half, some industry players wonder whether that could lead to a surge in imports.

Dofasco’s Aranha said during MSCI’s economic summit that hot-roll prices were reported to be at $510 per ton (September), compared to a first-half 2005 low of $425 and a third-quarter 2004 high of $740.

Citing figures from CRU International, a metals analysis firm based in London, he said, “Look at the price between the U.S. and European exports. Last year, imports took almost 40 percent of the Canadian market, up from a traditional level of about 25 percent; and up to 19 percent in the U.S. market, from a traditional level of about 15 percent.”

That surge in imports in late 2004, he said, was driven by the price differential between North American pricing and European and Russian export pricing. The price differential is now at about $153, he added, so “we should expect another surge.”

During the second half of 2004, Russia alone exported 600,000 tons of steel to the United States. “The speed at which steel can move around the globe in response to price differentials is like something we’ve never seen before. So given the differential we see now”—Aranha views $150 as a trigger price—we should expect to see imports returning, because other countries have more capacity than they need.”

Due to both the rapidity at which products migrate and the capacity at which countries are willing to export, it appears the market is moving toward less-than-annual cycles. “As prices fluctuate around the globe, within six months you start to see steel flowing. Twenty years ago, the cycles were three to five years long. They seem to be collapsing down to an annual cycle or even less,” Aranha said.

Steel analyst Chuck Bradford says he’s heard quotes of $560 to $580 per ton for October and November, up from $530 in September.

Asked whether current domestic prices will make the U.S. market desirable again for foreign steel, he notes that recent published reports show hot-roll coil in Europe fetching about $400. “Putting it on a boat to bring it here is maybe $50. The net effect is $450 per ton—well below what you’re now hearing for the domestic price.”


Scrap Volatility Unlikely to Abate
Steel industry participants and observers typically have a keen eye on the scrap market, but over the past couple months they’ve been even more vigilant—and quizzical.

John Anton, director-steel service at Global Insight Inc. in Washington, D.C., provides a bit of background. When many minimills were built from 1994 to 1998, he says, the price of scrap—except for half a dozen upward or downward spikes—was between $130 and $140 for five years, providing “a high degree of stability. Then the price plummeted, and then it exploded.”

In the past couple years, says Anton, “the scrap price has been all over the place. My model keeps saying the price should settle between $170 and $200, and more likely the low end of that range.”

More recently, export shipments of scrap—especially to developing steel-producing nations like China—have had an impact on domestic pricing. “Exports are boom and bust. We export three months worth in one month and the price spikes. Then we don’t export for a couple months and the price goes back down. It’s not really rational. The international buyers are not reacting logically, and it’s hard to time the emotion,” Anton remarks.

Joe Harden, president of Worthington Steel, says there has been a lot of speculation regarding the scrap market as it relates to Hurricane Katrina.

“In the end, will the difficulty of shipping scrap exports out of New Orleans affect prices vs. the increased difficulty of getting scrap or iron units into New Orleans? We don’t know. We think uncertainty has caused scrap prices to rise.”

He wonders what the right price is. “It’s probably not $340 or $128 (the recent high and low). I think the market is trying to find an appropriate value.”

Scrap for October was being quoted at $100 a ton higher, says Chuck Bradford, president of Bradford Research, New York. Many steel buyers had been sitting on the fence, anticipating that scrap, and thus steel, prices would soon come down. “Well, when scrap turned up, that game was over,” he says.

“It will be interesting to see what happens at the next scrap auction. If some of last month’s big increase was due to the hurricane, we ought to get it back [down] this month. It is much too soon to get any scrap out of New Orleans. Sunken barges will be scrapped. Flooded cars and trucks are going to get junked,” he adds.

William Vitucci, vice president and chief financial officer for Vitco Steel Supply Corp., Posen, Ill., which purchases primary and secondary material, also questions the impact of Katrina on the scrap and steel markets.

“Some people seem to be using it to hold or raise pricing; others don’t see it as a factor because it will take them six months to a year to find out what’s available to be rescrapped into the market.

“We heard there were vessels that had scrap on them missing throughout the coast and the docks. Those are gone. There may be some shortfall of scrap in the market due to that. No one knows for sure how much this will affect the U.S. market, because some of the lost scrap was bound for export markets,” Vitucci says.

 

 

Questions or comments about Metal Center News. E-mail feedback@metalcenternews.com