April 2006
Association
News

Mills to Buy Up Service Centers
in the Next Decade?

When voracious steel mills from around the globe are finished consuming each other through mergers and acquisitions, the service center sector will be the next course on their menu, predicts Nick Tolerico, retired president of ThyssenKrupp Steel Services in Richmond, S.C.

Tolerico was a panelist during the Steel Markets North America 2006 Conference last month in Chicago, co-sponsored by Steel Business Briefings and the American Institute of International Steel. Also on the distribution panel was Jay Gratz, executive vice president and CFO at Ryerson Inc., and Mike Taylor, president of Cargill Steel Services Co.

Noting that the list of leading flat-rolled service centers, such as Ryerson, Russel Metals, Worthington and Cargill, is a long and well-known one today, Tolerico expects the list to be decidedly shorter and different 10 years from now. Tomorrow’s major players in steel distribution may have names like Baosteel, CVRD Steel, Mittal Steel, Nucor Steel, Severstal Steel, ThyssenKrupp Steel and U.S. Steel.

Tolerico’s theory is based on the simple assumption that Wall Street money will be looking for a new home.

“In the first stage, a lot of financial buyers are stepping in. Apollo bought Metals USA, for example. There is a lot of money floating around looking to buy even more assets,” Tolerico says.

Eventually, such players will want an exit strategy so they can cash in their investment in metals distribution. Who are the natural buyers? Steel mills, Tolerico asserts.

The consolidation that has characterized the steel production industry in recent years will have played itself out by then. In order to feed the appetite of Wall Street, the remaining mills will have to find a new way to grow their sales and earnings. “The mills will either have to go upstream to iron ore or downstream to the service centers,” Tolerico says, speculating that service centers will be a more natural fit for integration.

Unlike in the past when mills owned distributors in North America, Tolerico predicts the owners of the future will emulate the European model and take a more hands-off approach to service center management. They will allow the service centers to continue focusing on customer service in an entrepreneurial way, and simply share in the profits.

“If they’re smart, that’s what they’ll do. That’s certainly what they should do,” Tolerico says.

Such an integrated ownership structure will allow for better balance between supply and demand and more stability of inventory, he notes, and can help the industry maintain a better handle on imports.

Tolerico points to the arrival of Mittal and Arcelor to North America and his own experience with ThyssenKrupp as grounds for his theory.

He could not predict exactly when mills will begin acquiring distributors, but he is confident the new M&A wave will arrive suddenly. Buyers will likely be aggressive, buying up three or four companies at a time, he says. “You’re either in or you’re out.”

Service centers should follow the ongoing M&A activity of the mills and determine which companies are going to emerge on top. “You have to consciously decide who to align yourself with. Otherwise, you could be on the outside looking in,” he says.

Tolerico’s co-panelists don’t foresee quite such drastic changes for the service center sector in the coming years, though they acknowledge that it will continue to consolidate.

Gratz asserts that in the end, performance will dictate the future prospects for service center operators. “The best supply chain will win out.”

During a question and answer segment, the panelists were asked what companies would survive in the face of consolidation. Gratz said the “economies are against (smaller companies) in the long run.”

Tolerico says the first victims will be mid-sized service companies, while Taylor agrees “there will always be a place for the strongly niched.”

Congress Considers Measure for
‘Restoring America’s Competitiveness’

The Committee to Support U.S. Trade Laws, an organization of companies, trade associations, labor unions and others, voiced its support for the Restoring America’s Competitiveness Act of 2006 at a Capitol Hill press conference last month.

The legislation, authored by Rep. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.), calls for the exercise of the constitutional power of Congress over international commerce, strengthening the administration and enforcement of U.S. trade laws.

“It articulates clearly and reinforces our objectives in the Doha Round. It particularly addresses concerns that the World Trade Organization’s dispute settlement system is not sufficiently transparent and has led to a number of decisions that have wrongly legislated new rights and obligations not negotiated and agreed to by the United States,” said Joseph L. Mayer, chairman of the committee and general counsel for the Copper and Brass Fabricators Council.

Among this bill’s provisions is a statement of Congressional intent that the U.S. Trade Representative should not agree to any proposal in the Doha Round that would weaken existing trade law remedies. The bill would create a Congressional Advisory Commission on WTO Dispute Settlement. It would direct the application of the countervailing duty law to non-market-economy countries, and designates exchange-rate manipulation as a prohibited export subsidy.

MSCI: U.S. Steel, Aluminum Shipments Increase
Shipments of steel and aluminum products from U.S. service centers rose in February, according to the latest Metals Activity Report from the Metals Service Center Institute, Rolling Meadows, Ill. Canadian service centers reported a decrease in steel shipments compared with year-earlier volume.

Month-end steel inventory-to-sales ratios rose from January levels in both countries and were higher for aluminum at U.S. service centers, while Canadian aluminum inventories were lower.

U.S. service centers shipped nearly 4.6 million tons of steel products in February, an increase of 2.1 percent from February 2005. Steel shipments for the first two months of the year, at 9.3 million tons, were up 3.5 percent from the same period in 2005.

Steel inventories totaled 13.3 million tons at the end of February—15.5 percent lower than at the end of February 2005, but 1.8 percent higher than at the end of January 2006. At the current shipping rate, U.S. service centers had a 2.9-month supply of steel products on hand at the end of February, a decrease of 17.3 percent from a year earlier, but 6.5 percent higher than January 2006.

Some 100,600 tons of aluminum products were shipped by U.S. service centers in February, up 7.1 percent from February 2005. In January and February, U.S. service centers shipped 203,100 tons of aluminum products, or 7.4 percent more than shipments from the same period last year.

Aluminum inventories at the end of February totaled 349,200 tons, a decrease of 2.5 percent from a year ago and down 1.2 percent from January 2006. At the current shipping rate, this represents a 3.5-month inventory supply, down 9.0 percent from a year ago, but up 0.8 percent from January.

Canadian service centers shipped 323,300 tons of steel products in February, down 5.0 percent from the same month in 2005 and reversing the strong growth shown in January. Shipments for the first two months of the year, at 676,400 tons, were down 0.2 percent from the first two months of 2005.

Canadian steel product inventories were above 1.0 million tons at the end of February, a decrease of 24.4 percent from the same month a year ago, but up fractionally (0.3 percent) from January 2006. At the current shipping rate, this represents a 3.2-month supply, down 20.5 percent from 2005, but an increase of 9.5 percent from January 2006.

February shipments of aluminum products totaled 9,700 tons in Canada, up 5.7 percent from February 2005. Year-to-date shipments of aluminum products by Canadian service centers, at 19,200 tons, were 5.6 percent higher than the same period a year ago.

Aluminum inventories at the end of February were 29,600 tons at Canadian service centers, some 7.1 percent lower than at the same time in 2005 and down 1.9 percent from January. At the current shipping rate, this represents a 3.1-month supply in inventory, a decrease of 12.1 percent from a year ago and down 3.1 percent from January 2006.

AISI: Domestic Mills Keep
Wary Eye on Imports

The United States imported 3.5 million net tons of steel in February, including 2.7 million net tons of finished steel. Year-to-date imports in these categories climbed 26 and 24 percent, respectively, vs. the same period in 2005, according to Census Bureau data reported by the American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, D.C.

Looking at a three-month rolling average, the trend shows that finished steel imports overall are up 27 percent and that, from certain countries, the import increase is especially pronounced: Taiwan, up 180 percent; Turkey, up 135 percent; China, up 86 percent; South Korea, up 62 percent; and India, up 59 percent. On an annualized basis, total steel imports would exceed 42.1 million net tons, which would be the second highest year in history, according to AISI officials.

Key products with large increases in February compared to the month before include: reinforcing bars, up 149 percent; structural shapes heavy, up 81 percent; tin plate, up 42 percent; cold-rolled sheets, up 35 percent; structural pipe and tubing, up 34 percent, and plates in coils, up 23 percent.

Products with sizable year-to-date increases through February, vs. 2005, include: reinforcing bars, up 138 percent; galvanized electrolytic sheets and strip, up 70 percent; bars-light shapes, up 81 percent; structural shapes heavy, up 79 percent; plates cut to length, up 60 percent; galvanized hot-dip sheets and strip, up 26 percent; and cold-rolled sheets, up 23 percent.

U.S. spot prices in February for hot- and cold-rolled sheet per ton were down vs. February 2005—from $662 to $545 for hot-rolled sheet, and from $715 to $630 for cold-rolled sheet—according to data publicly reported by Purchasing Magazine.

“Imports in the steel sector remain up sharply in 2006,” says John P. Surma, chairman and CEO of U.S. Steel Corp. and chairman of AISI. “As policymakers focus more and more on the nation’s trade problems, including our unsustainable trade deficit, it will be critical to ensure that imports—whether in steel or other sectors of the economy—compete based on market principles rather than through dumping, subsidies and other foreign trade distortions.”

“The bulk of the import increases are coming from countries where subsidies are prevalent, currency undervaluation is practiced and capacity increases outstrip domestic demand,” adds Andrew G. Sharkey III, president and CEO of AISI. “These trade distorting practices have the potential to damage the globally competitive U.S. and North American steel industry, and need to be addressed.”

ISSF: Stainless Production Declines in 2005
World stainless crude steel production declined by 1 percent to 24.6 million metric tons in 2005, according to the Brussels-based International Stainless Steel Forum.

The strong decrease in stainless steel production in the second half of 2005 has resulted in the first decline in yearly production since 2001. The cut in production in the final two quarters of 2005 was the result of dramatically reduced demand. Significant stock reductions have occurred at distributors and fabricators, ISSF reports.

Asia was the largest stainless steel producing area in the world during 2005 and the only main production area with an increase in stainless steel output during the year. Production was driven by increases in China (34 percent to 3.2 million tons) and India (11 percent to 1.5 million tons). All other stainless steel producing countries in Asia failed to match their 2004 output. In total, Asia’s stainless steel production grew by 5 percent to 12.5 million tons.

The second largest stainless steel producing region is Western Europe/Africa. Total output in the region dropped by 6.4 percent in 2005 to 8.8 million tons. Only Spain and Italy showed an increase in production compared to 2004. However, production in these countries was lower than normal in 2004 partly due to strikes.

Production in the Americas region decreased by 8 percent in 2005. Total output in 2005 was 2.5 million tons.

Demand for stainless steel in the Central and Eastern Europe region currently shows a strong increase. However, local production facilities cannot meet this demand. Stainless steel production in the region decreased by 2.5 percent to 310,000 tons, ISSF reports.

AIIS: Steel Imports Up 26%
in January, February

Imports in February remained essentially unchanged from final imports in January, rising only 1,000 net tons to 3.5 million net tons, based on preliminary steel import data released by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Compared to 2005, when the year-to-date period included high inventory levels that were depressing order books and import arrivals, imports rose 26.1 percent in the first two months of 2006.

This second monthly report for imports reflects robust underlying U.S. demand, low inventories and large price differentials when the February imports were ordered, three to five months prior, according to the Washington, D.C.-based American Institute of International Steel.

According to year-to-date figures for two months, imports increased 26.1 percent, from 5.57 million tons in 2005 to 7.02 million tons in 2006. The data show that semifinished imported products increased by 32.3 percent in February 2006 as compared to February 2005. For the year-to-date period, semifinished imports increased from 1.36 million tons in 2005 to 1.8 million tons in 2006, a 32.6 percent increase.

Briefs
Ruth Hambleton began work as project manager for steeluniversity.org in March. She joined the International Iron and Steel Institute from Outokumpu Stainless Tubular Products, Sweden, where she was unit development manager at the Storfors Business Unit.

The American Iron and Steel Institute and Association for Iron and Steel Technology Foundation are seeking proposals from students studying metallurgy and materials science under its FeMET Design Grant Program. Proposals will be judged based on technical approach, probability of success and potential benefits, team qualifications and relation to the 2006 theme: Comparative Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Assessments of Steel Products. The winning team may be awarded up to a $50,000 grant for its project.

 

 

Questions or comments about Metal Center News. E-mail feedback@metalcenternews.com