It’s a nightmare scenario for any business: A star employee suddenly decides to jump ship for the competition. Out the door goes years of experience, in-depth knowledge of sales and marketing plans, and even a good number of hard-won customer connections.
It’s that last part, with its costly ramifications, that can cause the most immediate damage. “Customers will often follow a departing employee out the door to his or her new employer,” says Richard Avdoian, an employee development consultant in St. Louis. “People like to stay with employees they trust.”
Longer range, the ghosting of a top performing employee obviates any plans for grooming that person for a management role. “When you lose your best employees you lose not only their skills but also their leadership potential,” says David Dye, president of Let’s Grow Leaders, a management consulting firm in Washington.
Expect more star employees to seek greener pastures in the months ahead, and fewer quality replacement prospects. With the nation’s unemployment level hovering just over 4 percent, most economists believe the labor market has reached a condition of full employment. As top-quality talent grows scarce, other employers in your region will try harder than ever to lure away your best people.
“When demand for personnel is high and supply is low, people have more choices for where to work,” says Dye. “Employers have greater difficulty retaining the best performers, and the value rises for those individuals’ work skills.” In rural areas, especially, where employers reside far from large cities with concentrated pools of talent, quality employees come at a premium.
How about your own business? Do you think your top performers will hesitate to leave? Maybe so, but the fact remains that people who perform the best in the workplace tend to suffer the most from wandering eyes. A survey by SAP and Oxford Economics, published in The Harvard Business Review, found less than half of high performers were satisfied with their current duties. One in five is likely to seek a greener pasture in the next six months.
Spot the Stars
So how do you keep your own best people from fleeing? The first step is to make sure you focus on the brightest stars. Avdoian suggests looking at your employment pool as a complex of three classes of workers on an escalating scale of value: slackers, foundationals, and high achievers. Slackers are easy to spot: They do the bare minimum to collect their paychecks. Foundational employees, in contrast, perform their duties in a conscientious and dependable manner, serving as reliable anchors to your business. The final category consists of people who outperform the norm. “High achievers are driven go-getters,” says Avdoian. “They are your most productive employees.” These individuals can deliver up to 400 percent more productivity to a workplace than other employees, according to the HBR report.
With this short list in hand, make sure you give your best people the specific things they need to keep them on board. And just what do they want more than anything else? The answer is probably not surprising: The HBR report found that top performers care significantly more than average or low-performing ones about competitive compensation. You must offer them a salary commensurate with their skills and at least equal to what other employers in your region provide.
Pay for Performance
High performers also care more than their slacker or foundational coworkers about the ability to earn bonus pay based on performance. “The opportunity to make more money through their achievements is an incentive for your top performers to stick around,” says Donna Cutting, CEO of Red Carpet Learning Systems, Asheville, N.C. Top salespeople, for example, will expect additional compensation when they outperform their peers. The goal is to create a win-win situation for employer and worker: Fixed compensation costs remain low while employees have the chance to earn more when they excel.
A pay for performance system is a far cry from the familiar reward relics of the past, such as the annual seniority-based salary hike and the automatic year-end bonus. The problem was the conventional system wasn’t getting the job done, because it did not incentivize better performance. High performers resented the fact they were not rewarded for their superior productivity at a rate any higher than others and ongoing salary increases bloated payrolls until the business risked becoming uncompetitive.
Besides its direct financial component, such pay serves to highlight the connection between employee actions and organizational success. “It’s important that people understand their overall part in the success of a business,” says Cutting. “Performance-based pay does that.” At some companies performance compensation represents more than 20 percent of take-home pay.
Valuable as it is as a retention tool, performance-based pay carries the hazard of unwittingly rewarding the wrong behavior. “You need to be careful that the performance objectives you set are in alignment with your business values,” warns Cutting. She points to the recent experience at Wells Fargo, a bank that rewarded its employees for burdening customers with unwanted accounts, as a textbook illustration of a performance-based pay scheme gone bad.
On the other side of that coin, performance-based pay won’t work if employees are unclear about how their actions directly contribute to the organization’s bottom line, or lack sufficient know-how to perform to their maximum potential. “You need to make sure employees have a sufficient measure of control over meeting the described objectives,” says Cutting. “And they must be given the proper tools to do so.”
One more hazard for performance-based pay: Employees left out of the program may resent their inability to earn bonus compensation. That’s why it’s important to include everyone, even those for whom it’s difficult to measure quantifiable workplace results.
“For people who are solely responsible for their work, and where their activities can be readily quantified, pay for performance plans are more straightforward,” says Dye. That’s why many organizations begin by tracking easily measurable achievements such as higher revenues by salespeople, accident reductions by security personnel and glowing customer reports for service representatives.
Designing an effective program is more difficult for some members of the support staff who do not perform in quantifiable ways. However, it is not impossible. “You can make pay for performance work for receptionists, housekeepers or any kind of support staff, as long as they are given the necessary tools by management,” says Cutting.
Vital as it is, performance pay is not the only tool for retaining top employees. You also need to cultivate a respectful and supportive work environment. “It’s important that people understand what the business wants, and that they feel valued when they meet the employer’s expectations,” says Cutting. “The ability to contribute and to feel involved with the success of the organization can be its own motivation.”
Here are some additional factors that keep your best people aboard:
- Autonomy. “High performers do not like to be micromanaged,” says Christina Eanes, a workforce management consultant in Alexandria, Va. “They want the freedom to do their job in a creative way, along with the requisite responsibility and authority.”
- Frequent feedback. Top performers want to know where they stand, and want feedback more than once a year. A negative December surprise, especially if it affects bonus pay, may well send them packing. The HBR report highlights the importance of monthly performance reviews.
- Advancement pathways. Top performers expect the employer to help them advance in their fields. “You need to create a culture where people want to work with you because of what they are going to learn and have a real clear-cut career ladder so they see how they can move up,” says Cutting.
Sometimes clearing a path for advancement is easier said than done. In a perfect world a business would have enough open management positions to accommodate every deserving person. Reality is often much different. What can you do? “You need to create a growth path for top-performing people that keeps them feeling challenged even though they are not advanced into management positions,” says Dye.
One solution is to feed the craving of top performers for new skills. “High achievers have an insatiable need for self-development,” says Eanes. “The more opportunities you can provide them to learn, the more loyal they will be.”
Those opportunities can be offered by thinking laterally. “Not every top performer expects that advancement means a higher-level position,” says Eanes. “Millennials, especially, often prefer to move laterally because it provides them with more learning opportunities and more challenges.”
These work environment modifications, combined with a robust pay for performance plan, should go a long way toward keeping your best people from leaving.